The main great experience was during the exam. The support was excellent

Amazing it is. What's going on

The trainer covered the course content giving real life and relatable examples of using the method. They were friendly and approachable and happy to answer any queries that we had. Great course and really insightful.

The style and pace of the whole training was just right, switching between information influx and regular breaks. Explanations clean and to the point with examples where needed to help understand the materials. Fair and friendly to all attendants, answering all questions without judgement.

the exam is well coordinated, it was nice experience. prince2 has laborated IQ in project management

The questions in my test set were not clear, so it was difficult to apply the knowledge I had gained. There should be no trickery or ambiguity.

Very good Training! The Material of the curse are very objective and easy to understand. The Company makes a very good job!

bad trsanslation not user friendly page

I had to wait because promt was not on time

The language restrictions for the ITIL 4 exam in in-person settings should be reconsidered. Currently, if the in-person training is conducted in a specific language, the corresponding in-person exam must also be taken in that language. This policy applies even when the test proctor is certified to administer the exam in a different language, such as English, which may be more suitable for the candidate. This restriction feels outdated and unnecessarily rigid in a globalized world. For example, German is my fourth language, and while I attended in-person training in Germany—where most sessions are naturally conducted in German—the requirement to also take the in-person exam in German posed a significant challenge. Allowing exam takers to choose their preferred language for the in-person exam, regardless of the training language, would greatly enhance inclusivity and better serve the needs of ITIL’s diverse, multilingual audience.